UNITED NATIONS
    • Knowledge Service Section
    • About
    • Blog
    • Help
  • My Account
  • Knowledge Service Section
  • About
  • Blog
  • Help
Knowledge Repository
English | Français

46470 publications

Advanced Search
View Item 
  •   ECA IR Home
  • Work programmes
  • Regional Integration and Trade
  • Trade
  • View Item
  •   ECA IR Home
  • Work programmes
  • Regional Integration and Trade
  • Trade
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Digital Trade Regulatory Review for Asia-Pacific, Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean 2024:ESCAP-ECA-ECLAC Initiative on Digital Trade Regulatory Integration

Thumbnail
View
b533085.pdf
Download
b533085.pdf (17.28Mb)
Published
2024-07
Author(s)/Corporate Author (s)
United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa;
United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center;
United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa;
United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center;
Share
 Facebook
 Twitter
 Linkedin
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The report underscores the importance of regulatory cooperation in minimizing the fragmentation of digital trade rules, enhancing transparency, and reducing uncertainties, and lowering compliance costs, which disproportionately affect small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) more than large firms. According to data collected in 2023-2024, the regional average RDTII scores are highest for the Asia-Pacific region (0.41), followed by Africa (0.34) and then LAC (0.25). The index scores reveal that firms operating in Asia-Pacific economies are likely to encounter higher digital-trade regulatory compliance costs compared to those in Africa and LAC. Conversely, firms in LAC economies face the lowest compliance costs. Furthermore, the regulatory similarity index, which reflects the relative proximity of digital trade policies across jurisdictions, indicates that regulatory cooperation would be most beneficial in the Asia-Pacific region, followed by Africa and LAC, respectively. This is attributed to the relatively low level of regulatory similarity within the Asia-Pacific group (0.64), in comparison to the African group (0.68). and the LAC group (0.73). This 2024 edition of the Digital Trade Regulatory Review for Asia-Pacific, Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean includes data up to 2023 based on the RDTII 2.0 research framework. The report consists of five chapters. The first chapter provides an overview of the RDTII 2.0 framework. The subsequent chapters two, three and four — detail the key findings of the RDTII 2.0 for the Asia-Pacific, African and LAC regions, respectively. The final chapter synthesizes the findings from all three regions to put forward recommendations for digital trade policy.
Citation
“United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center (2024-07). Digital Trade Regulatory Review for Asia-Pacific, Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean 2024:ESCAP-ECA-ECLAC Initiative on Digital Trade Regulatory Integration. Addis Ababa:. © UN. ECA,. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/50262”
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10855/50262
Collections
  • Trade [2788]
 

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    Thumbnail
    Regional Digital Trade Integration Index 2.0: A Guide :ESCAP-ECA-ECLAC Initiative on Digital Trade Regulatory Integration
    United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center
    “United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center (2024-07). Regional Digital Trade Integration Index 2.0: A Guide :ESCAP-ECA-ECLAC Initiative on Digital Trade Regulatory Integration. Addis Ababa:. © UN. ECA,. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/50263”
    Thumbnail
    Regional Digital Trade Integration Index (Version 1): A Guide
    United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center
    “United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Regional Integration and Trade Division. African Trade Policy Center (2022). Regional Digital Trade Integration Index (Version 1): A Guide. Addis Ababa:. © UN. ECA,. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/50265”
    Thumbnail
    Lessons of integration in Latin America : by Robert J. Berg consultant
    African Union Commission; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; African Union Commission
    “Robert J., Berg; African Union Commission; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; African Union Commission (2002-03). Lessons of integration in Latin America : by Robert J. Berg consultant. UN. ECA African Development Forum(3rd :2002, Mar. 3 - 8 :Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). Addis Ababa:. © UN. ECA,. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/47113”
Browse
All of ECA IRCommunities & CollectionsTitleAuthorSubjectBy Issue DateECA Conference ProceedingsFlagship PublicationHas File(s)SpeechesPress ReleasesResolutionsBest PracticesThis CollectionTitleAuthorSubjectBy Issue DateECA Conference ProceedingsFlagship PublicationHas File(s)SpeechesPress ReleasesResolutionsBest Practices
My Account
My AccountRegister
Reporting Suite
Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
A service provided by the Economic Commission for Africa - Contact Us - Send Feedback
Follow us: