Cost-benefit analysis for regional infrastructure in water and power sectors in Southern Africa
View
Download
Published
2012-09Author(s)/Corporate Author (s)
United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office South Africa (SRO-SA);Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This report presents the output of an analytically study of Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and key issues and challenges of regional infrastructure development in the Southern African subregion. The report aims to inform decision makers and guide investment in regional
infrastructure projects in the SADC region and offer general policy advice.
Citation
“United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office South Africa (SRO-SA) (2012-09). Cost-benefit analysis for regional infrastructure in water and power sectors in Southern Africa. Addis Ababa :. © UN. ECA ,. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/22231”Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Draft report Validation meeting on the study to assess the feasibility of establishing and managing a common agro-industrial park between Zambia and Zimbabwe
United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office South Africa (SRO-SA); United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office South Africa (SRO-SA)
“United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office South Africa (SRO-SA); United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office South Africa (SRO-SA) (2021-05). Draft report Validation meeting on the study to assess the feasibility of establishing and managing a common agro-industrial park between Zambia and Zimbabwe. Addis Ababa :. © UN. ECA,. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/47759”
Report of the thirty-sixth session of the Intergovernmental Committee of Senior Officials and Experts for North Africa
United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Sub regional office for North Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Sub regional office for North Africa
“United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Sub regional office for North Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Sub regional office for North Africa (2021-12). Report of the thirty-sixth session of the Intergovernmental Committee of Senior Officials and Experts for North Africa. UN. ECA Intergovernmental Committee of Senior Officials and Experts for North Africa (36th sessions : 2021, Nov. 24 : Addia Ababa, Ethiopia). Addis Ababa :. © UN. ECA,. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/47917”
Concept note
United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office West Africa (SRO-WA); United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office West Africa (SRO-WA)
“United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office West Africa (SRO-WA); United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa; United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa. Subregional Office West Africa (SRO-WA) (2022-08). Concept note. UN.ECA Intergovernmental Committee of Senior Officials and Experts for North Africa (1st Joint Session: 2022, Nov. 1-3: Marrakech, Morocco); UN.ECA Intergovernmental Committee of Senior Officials and Experts for West Africa (1st Joint Session: 2022, Nov. 1-3: Marrakech, Morocco). Addis Ababa :. © UN. ECA,. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/49128”